If Trump’s Opponents Don’t Bring Up His SCOTUS Fave At The Debate, They Don’t Want To Beat Him…
The political world is reeling from the tragic news that Antonin Scalia has passed away at 79 today.
No doubt this will be a big topic at the GOP debates tonight, but opponents to Trump might want to bring up who he said he’d love on the Supreme Court just last August.
From National Review:
Donald Trump told Mark Halperin yesterday that his sister, a federal judge, would be a “phenomenal” Supreme Court justice. He also said that “we will have to rule that out now, at least.”
If he ever becomes president, let’s hope he rules it out permanently. Maryanne Trump Barry came up in my book The Party of Death for writing one of those heated judicial decisions in favor of giving constitutional protection to partial-birth abortion. She called a New Jersey law against it a “desperate attempt” to undermine Roe v. Wade. It was, she wrote, “based on semantic machinations, irrational line-drawing, and an obvious attempt to inflame public opinion instead of logic or medical evidence.” It made no difference where the fetus was when it “expired.”
So: The right of abortionists to make a child “expire” by partially extracting her from the womb, sticking scissors in the back of her head, vacuuming out her brain, and crushing her skull to complete her extraction, is right there in the Constitution. But let’s please not have any “semantic machinations.”
How do you think this will play in South Carolina and other states where social issues are paramount to many conservatives?
And let us not forget that he said he would completely undo Obama’s executive actions, but then replace them with his own.
Destroying the Constitution isn’t any more appetizing when Trump does it, than when Obama does it…
